[ad_1]
This article covers a developing story. Continue to check back with us as we will be adding more information as it becomes available.
A new report has revealed that Furiosa: A Mad Max Saga led to a $120 million loss for Warner Bros. The movie is a prequel to the Oscar-nominated hit Mad Max: Fury Road. The prequel follows the story of Furiosa as she goes from a kidnapped child to a strong adult ready to fight the powers of be. In place of Charlize Theron, Anya Taylor-Joy and Alyla Browne played the lead, with a supporting cast that included Chris Hemsworth, Tom Burke, Lachy Hulme, and George Shevtsov.
As per a new report from Deadline, Furiosa is reported to have lost Warner Bros. nearly $120 million. This is based on the sum of the movie’s total revenue and total costs. In addition to its theatrical haul, Furiosa is reported to have made $50 million via home entertainment and $85 million on television and streaming. Unfortunately, this could not offset its production costs, which, with prints, ads, and distribution, came out to $330.6 million, ultimately leading to the movie’s $119.6 million loss.
What This Means For Furiosa
The Film Vastly Underperformed Fury Road
Given the success of its Tom Hardy-led predeccessor, director George Miller and the Warner Bros. team were hoping for another blockbuster with Furiosa. Ultimately, it underperformed Fury Road in several ways. Furiosa‘s reviews were lesser than those of its predeccesor, getting a 90% in comparison to Fury Road‘s 97%. The movie also was not nominated for any Oscars, which was a big contrast to Mad Max: Fury Road, which won 6 Oscars and was nominated for others including Best Picture.
The recent report reveals just how much Furiosa underperformed the previous franchise film at the box office. Though the exact metrics are news, it has been known for a while that Furiosa almost certain lost Warner Bros. millions. Before ad costs, the budget was estimated at $168 million, a number that Deadline confirms in the new report. It went on to make only $174 million at the worldwide box office, which was not nearly enough to meet the total of $330.6 million cost, even with streaming revenue.
More to come…
Source: Deadline
This article covers a developing story. Continue to check back with us as we will be adding more information as it becomes available.
[ad_2]
Source link